‘Training simulation:’ Mass killers often share obsession with violent video games


A decade after Evan Ramsey sneaked a 12-gauge shotgun into his Alaska high school, where he gunned down a fellow student and the principal and wounded two others, he described how playing video games had warped his sense of reality.

“I did not understand that if I…pull out a gun and shoot you, there’s a good chance you’re not getting back up,” Ramsey said in a 2007 interview from Spring Creek Correctional Center, in Seward, Alaska. “You shoot a guy in ‘Doom’ and he gets back up. You have got to shoot the things in ‘Doom’ eight or nine times before it dies.”

Since Ramsey’s 1997 rampage, several other mass killers, including Columbine shooters Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold and Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik, have been linked to violent video games. And some experts worry that as the games get more violent and more realistic, so does their power to blur the line between fantasy and reality in alienated gamers.

‘It’s quite possible that playing this script out numerous times in the game influenced his decision-making — and that is in fact what he said.’

–  Dr. Paul Weigle, child and adolescent psychiatrist

“Doom,” the computer video game Ramsey described, was all the rage in the 1990s, but primitive by today’s standards, where gamers can play first-person shooters with movie-like graphics on high definition televisions.

“More than any other media, these video games encourage active participation in violence,” said Bruce Bartholow, an associate professor of psychology at the University of Missouri, who has studied the issue. “From a psychological perspective, video games are excellent teaching tools because they reward players for engaging in certain types of behavior. Unfortunately, in many popular video games, the behavior is violence.”

Harris and Klebold, who killed 12 fellow students and a teacher in 1999, were reportedly obsessed with “Doom.” Seung-Hui Cho, the 23-year-old who killed 32 people at Virginia Tech University in 2007, was, according to the Washington Post, a big fan of violent video games, specifically “Counterstrike.”

Three more recent killers, Aurora, Colo., movie theater gunman James Holmes, Jared Lee Loughner, who killed six and injured 13, including Rep. Gabby Giffords, in a 2011 Arizona shooting, and Breivik, who killed 77 people in Oslo, all were active video game players.

Adam Lanza, the troubled 20-year-old behind last December’s school shooting in Connecticut which left 20 children and six adults dead, was an avid player of violent video games.
In some cases, murderers appear to have been reenacting specific video game episodes when they killed in real life.

“Anders Breivik said he actually used his video game ‘Call of Duty’ to train for mass murder,”  Dr. Paul Weigle, a child and adolescent psychiatrist at the Joshua Center, in Enfield, Conn., told FoxNews.com. “He called it training simulation. And certainly there were some reports Adam Lanza saw Breivik as a rival, and he was also engaged in shooting games and even the same one.”

Wiegel also cited the case of Devin Moore, an Alabama teen with no history of violence when he was brought in by police on a minor traffic violation. Once inside the police station, he took a gun from a police officer and shot three officers, then stole a police cruiser to make his escape.

“Life is a video game,” Moore, who said he was inspired by the game ‘Grand Theft Auto,’” told police later. “Everybody’s got to die sometime.”

“It’s quite possible that playing this script out numerous times in the game influenced his decision-making, and that is, in fact, what he said,” Wiegel said.

Advocates of victims of mass shootings have taken aim at the companies turning profits in the multibillion-dollar gaming industry. The parents of the victims killed or injured by Michael Carneal, a 14-year-old who fired upon a group of classmates at Heath High School in West Paducah, Ky., in 1997, filed suit against a host of video game manufacturers in relation to Carneal’s obsession with violent games including “Doom” and “Mortal Kombat.”

The case was dismissed in 2001, with the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that it was “simply too far a leap from shooting characters on a video screen to shooting people in a classroom.”

Several experts agree with the court decision, telling FoxNews.com that the link is either inconclusive, or that playing violent video games can at most be just one of several causes that prompts people to kill.

“I think it’s the wrong question — whether there is a link between mass shootings and violent video game play,” Dr. Doug Gentile, a research psychologist and associate professor at Iowa State University, told FoxNews.com. “I understand people want to look for a culprit, but the truth of the matter is that there is never one cause. There is a cocktail of multiple causes coming together. And so no matter what single thing we focus on, whether it be violent video games, abuse as a child, doing drugs, being in a gang — not one of them is sufficient to cause aggression. But when you start putting them together, aggression becomes pretty predictable.”

Dr. Phyllis Koch-Sheras, past president of the American Psychological Association’s Society of Media Psychology and Technology, said the link between fantasy violence on computer or television screens and real violence that leaves people injured or dead needs more study.

“We have to be very careful about saying what causes what,” Koch-Sheras said. “There is a lot of debate on the issue. But this much is certain: We need to definitely be studying this more before the violent video games run amok.”


source: FoxNews


5 thoughts on “‘Training simulation:’ Mass killers often share obsession with violent video games

  1. Pingback: ‘Frag him’: Video games ratchet up violence, blur line between fantasy and reality | After Dark Gaming

  2. parents often share a passion for gaming. Teachers share a passion for gaming. Considering how many play games, of course some are going to be killers. Killers drink tea/coffee/water, breath air, watch tv, do we blame their behaviour on that? It’s bullcrap.

  3. I agree with Foxie. Correlation does not equal causation. There may be links between violent games and mass murderers, but this does not mean that it is what unleashed their horror. I suspect people with such interests are drawn to these games as it helps satisfy their curiosity or urges.

    Let us not forget that the world was filled with people committing horrible and barbaric acts before the advent of computer games. There is a dark part in each person’s heart. We just have different abilities to control and channel the darkness into something positive, or at the very least to keep it locked up in such a way that it does not break free.

    If you are unfortunate enough to suffer from mental illness or have gone through trauma earlier in life, your ability to keep things in check is going to be greatly diminished. I am glad that you highlight the fact that this is most likely a multi-factorial issue that needs to be further examined. The knee-jerk response of saying violent games are inherently bad will not help resolve the problem, as it only puts a figurative band aid on it to conceal the deeper underlying issues.

  4. I think that to some degree, it’s possible that at a very young age violent video games can influence behavior. Young children learn and mimic the people and environment around them. I think most people have seen this at some point. I have seen it and I do not have any of my own children. That being said, young children shouldn’t be playing violent video games to begin with. However, since we live in a free country, we can’t control what parents allow, or what they teach their children.

    There is never only one factor that creates a personality in a person. Therein lies the problem, because that’s what society wants. We want an easy 1 step solution to get rid of our fears and pain. When terrible things happen, we want to believe we can find a way for it to never happen again. It just isn’t that simple. It never will be that simple.

    I grew up playing “violent” video games, though they could hardly compare to the realistic ones of today. I also grew up with guns in my house, because my father hunted. I grew up with him butchering all the animals himself, too.

    I do not hunt. I could never intentionally kill another living thing, unless it was to save my own life. I would much rather save an animal than kill it. I have no problem seeing these things though; I’m used to them. I also eat everything he hunts, so I have not become the opposite as a result. His hunting has influenced my life. I am desensitized enough to be use to seeing dead animals, but not so much that I don’t care or can’t make up my own opinion. I appreciate life, and pain. I can’t be the end of one or the cause of the other.

    But just that one little thing has shaped apart of my life.

    I am an avid video game lover, but I agree and disagree with this issue all the time. We can’t say the black and white answers. We can look at video games as the one factor to blame. We can’t look away, and pretend it can’t influence someone, either. Neither one is the answer.

  5. Pingback: ‘Watch this:’ How ultraviolent video games and ultraviolent films differ | After Dark Gaming

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s